|
||||||||
|
By
Alison Hsiao / Staff reporter Mon,
Dec 01, 2014 - Page 1 Academics
yesterday were in sync on the bleak outlook for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in the remainder of his term, but were at
loggerheads on how Saturday’s nine-in-one election
results would affect Beijing’s Taiwan policy with
the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) setback at the
polls, which took many in the party and the public by surprise. There
was wide agreement among speakers at a forum in Taipei on the elections’
impact that Ma is officially a lame duck president and that poor governance
was a major cause of the KMT’s defeat. At
the time of the symposium — which was hosted by the Institute for National
Policy Research — it was not clear whether Ma was to resign as KMT chairman. “Last
year, the KMT charter was amended to make any KMT president the party’s ex
officio chairman; maybe Ma foresaw the catastrophic result when that policy
was written,” Ming Chuan
University professor Wu Hsin-hsing (吳新興) said. “KMT infighting and
political realignment will surely ensue [after the election failure].” “Ma
should step down both as KMT chairman and as president,” to avoid a prolonged
power struggle within the party, said Tang Shao-cheng
(湯紹成),
a research fellow in the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University. “Having
[Vice President] Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) take over and consolidate
party unity is the only chance that the KMT has to make its prospects for the
2016 presidential election somewhat hopeful,” Tang said. The
speakers said the KMT’s cross-strait relations program — including the
service trade pact, which is awaiting legislative review — should not be
pushed further by a lame-duck president and a governing party that has
suffered such a drubbing. “The
pace of cross-strait interaction would decelerate, as the Ma administration
has lost its legitimacy to deal with China,” Wu said. Chao
Chien-min (趙建民), director of the Graduate Institute for Sun Yat-sen Thoughts and Mainland China Studies at the
Chinese Culture University, expressed pessimism over the effect a possible
halt to dealings with China could have on cross-strait ties. The
voters have demonstrated with their ballots that neither the economy nor the
nation’s international space is an important factor for them, Chao said. “As
the two issues are what the KMT has been championing, with this response, how
far can the cross-strait relationship go?” Chao added. Chao
called the KMT’s thrashing “the beginning of a sad story.” As
cross-strait interactions wane, “businesspeople and talented people might
migrate,” he said. Chao
said that during the former Democratic Progressive Party administration,
Beijing refused to talk to the government, which meant there is no reason to
believe China will change its Taiwan policy. David
Huang (黃偉峰),
an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica,
said that the economy is the main issue for voters. Huang
said young people are distressed over skyrocketing housing prices and
disapprove of “cross-strait brokers” who have been monopolizing dealings with
China. Nobody
can deny that having exchanges with China is inevitable and necessary, but
“it is the [existing] type of cross-strait interactions, which are
monopolized by princelings, intermediate brokers and big corporations, that
people are against,” Huang said. “People
are not convinced that the bonuses of the trade agreement signed with China’s
government will trickle down to them,” Huang said. Huang
said that Beijing is flexible enough to refrain from forcing the so-called “1992
consensus” on pan-green camp political figures. “It
is when dealing with the DPP as a party and DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) — if party-to-party
engagement is to be done — that the Chinese
government might have a problem,” he said. Lin
Cheng-yi (林正義), also a research fellow at Academia Sinica, said the DPP could follow the US’ suit and “acknowledge” rather than “recognize” the “one
China” policy and suspend the controversy for the sake of cross-strait
engagements. At
another forum on the results of the elections, panelists said the results
showed voters — especially younger ones — protested government policies via
their ballots. The
forum, held by Taiwan Thinktank, said that while
the DPP benefited from voter anger against the KMT, the main opposition party
should be cautious that it might also be swept by voters if it cannot
appreciate the way they are thinking. “Young voters are desperate, because they feel they might only be able
to work at a drinks shop, making a little more than NT$100 per hour,” said
Shih Cheng-feng (施正鋒), a professor in
the Department of Indigenous Affairs and Development at National Dong Hwa University. “They are looking for a change, but the
KMT would not change.” “This time, it might be a tsunami. Next time, it could be a volcanic
eruption that would sweep away even the DPP if it cannot appeal to voters’
desires,” Shih said.
* 《Taipei Times》2014/12/01。 |
