Cooperation with the
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) might be the only
way for the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) to survive
under the new electoral system approved by the
National Assembly yesterday, political analysts said
yesterday.
"Given that the DPP's
votes overlap with the TSU's, I think the best
strategy for the TSU at this point is to cooperate
with the DPP in line with the TSU's actual strength in
each constituency," said presidential advisor Chin
Heng-wei (金恆煒), who is
editor-in-chief of Contemporary Magazine.
"The small parties of the
Fifth Republic of France used such a strategy to
secure their development, which worked," Chin said.
With the passage of the
constitutional amendment, the new "single-member
district, two-vote" electoral system will be adopted
in 2007. Under this electoral system, small parties
will likely be squeezed out by the two big parties
since there is only one seat in each constituency.
"The current circumstance
for the pan-green camp is that separation will hurt
both sides, but cooperation will benefits both sides,"
Chin said.
The TSU's situation is
different from that of the People First Party (PFP),
which will inevitably be absorbed by the Chinese
Nationalist Party (KMT) if it resists merging with the
KMT, because the two pan-blue parties's platforms are
so similar, he said.
The TSU, by contrast, has
its own steadfast supporters who will not convert to
the DPP, because of their adherence to a belief in
Taiwan's independence and former president Lee
Teng-hui's (李登輝) political line,
Chin said.
The DPP will also need to
collaborate with the TSU given that the "single-member
district and two-vote system" is somewhat unfavorable
to the DPP, he said.
"How the constituencies
are delimited will influence the DPP's mode of
cooperation with the TSU," Chin added.
The urgency for the TSU
is to settle on a future direction, and decide whether
to challenge President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁)
authority or assist him.
"I don't think the new
electoral system foreshadows a dim destiny for small
parties," Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明), a
research fellow at the Research Center for Humanities
and Social Sciences at Academia Sinica. "As long as
the TSU figures out its future political line, it
still has a chance to become the third-largest party
in the legislature."
"But it is time for the
TSU to think about where its opportunities are," Hsu
said. "It seems that now the TSU has two factions --
one made up of those who have public posts, such as
legislators or presidential advisors, and other made
up of those who have nothing."
The thinking and action
of these two factions is quite different, Hsu said,
pointing out that TSU members who have public offices
maintain that the party should cooperate with Chen,
while the other faction insists on taking a
confrontational position against the DPP government.
Hsu said the TSU has to
cool down after its outrage over the passage of
constitutional amendments and think about whether it
should go back to its old stance of supporting Chen's
government.
"Lee decided to support
Chen before the legislative elections last December,"
Hsu said. "Looking back at history, the DPP also chose
to cooperate with Lee when it was an opposition party
to expand its room for growth, which proved to be
effective. The TSU might follow the same model and try
to work with Chen."
"Chen might take the TSU
into consideration when making decisions or political
arrangements if the TSU becomes loyal to him," Hsu
said.
Shih Cheng-feng (施正鋒),
a professor in Tamkang University's department of
public administration, echoed part of Hsu's opinion,
saying that conflict within the TSU is hampering the
party.
"The TSU includes
members coming from the DPP and the KMT, who form
invisible factions," Shih said. "I think it's a crisis
that the TSU leader has to tackle."
Shih said the TSU
cannot give in to the DPP in future elections. On the
contrary, it should battle hard for its own nominees
in the year-end elections for city mayors and county
commissioners.
"I think the TSU
should try its best to nominate candidates in every
constituency in the year-end elections, so that it can
force the DPP to negotiate with it," Shih said.
"If the DPP senses
that the TSU's strategy could endanger its own
chances, then the TSU could seize the chance to
negotiate on [pan-green] cooperation in the next
legislative elections in 2007, and even the
presidential election in 2008," he said. |